Thursday, May 23, 2013

The post office hiatus continues


I did a little budget update today, and I realized that I'm not going to return to my regular pace of sending out packages as early as I'd hoped.

Sorry to report that it will be yet another week of shipping nothing. I feel terrible about this. I have stacks ready to send people. I have mailing equipment standing by.

I thought it would be the right thing to do to actually sit down and finalize a list of all the folks who need packages from me. So after hurling a few well-placed curses at the bills in the inbox, I confined myself to my room and came up with a tally.

Here are the folks who will get packages from me first when I deem myself financially capable of doing so. I haven't forgotten about you:

All Trade Bait All The Time
David, the Pirates fan
The Dutch Card Guy
Jake Plumstead
Cards On Cards
2 By 3 Heroes
Starting Nine
Cardboard Heaven
Jeff, the Angels fan
Tops Of The Topps
Tim Wallach
Dime Boxes
This Way To The Clubhouse
Scott Crawford on Cards
Life and Baseball Cards
Cardboard Collections
Funner Here
The Angels, In Order
The Underdog Card Collector
Hot Corner Cards
Nolan's Dugout (you thought I forgot about your email, didn't you? Nope. Just poor)
mr. haverkamp

I think that's it. Actually, I think I've probably missed a couple. Just let me get some packages out to the above folks and then I'll deal with who's missing.

Obviously, when I can get back to sending cards all of the above aren't going to get their packages all at once. I'd be banned from the post office if I showed up with 22 packages. But it feels good to at least be on that list, right?

Anyway, I can't just show lists here. I've got to show some cards. Here is a PWE from Pat at Hot Corner Cards.

In it was my first 2013 Bowman Dodger, Adrian Gonzalez -- I told you I wasn't buying any cards lately.

He also sent me another Bowman Dodger:


Yup, it's Gonzalez again. Still following that titanic blast. Let's have more of those, A-Gone.

There was another card sitting between the two Gonzalez cards. Kind of hiding. Like it didn't consider itself worthy among all the fresh, new Bowman.

But it's plenty worthy:


I really need to get back to the post office.

Us vs. Them


I fear that there is one thing that will eventually make me stop following major league baseball.

It won't be interleague play or shaving cream shaming rituals or robot umps. It will be the amount of money that baseball players are making.

I've never been one to begrudge the money that major leaguers make. While my father openly mocks the cash players receive, I understand that they're entertainers and entertainers in successful businesses are paid handsomely. We can holler about the injustice of teachers, doctors, scientists (or, god forbid, journalists) not receiving what they're worth in comparison, but we live in an entertainment, consumer-driven society.

So although the amount of money a long-innings relief pitcher makes in one year repeatedly blows my mind as I bounce checks over a simple monthly bill, I get it. Big leaguers are paid what the market will bear. I understand.

But I don't like what it's doing to everyone else. They obviously can't handle it.

This is not a new phenomenon and not news to anyone, but the otherwordly amount of cash that major leaguers make has turned baseball players' relationship with the general public into an "Us vs. Them" schism.

I've mentioned this before on the blog. It concerns me quite a bit. I grew up during the first stirrings of free agency. The cartoons on some of the first baseball cards I ever collected mentioned the second jobs that players held down in the offseason. I actually remember a time when players were like you and I in terms of trying to make ends meet. Sure, they made a little more than the average Joe and Judy, but they were "regular guys." The money they took home certainly wasn't enough to create any drama on the scale of what just happened with Matt Kemp.

Kemp, as you know by now, generously offered $1,000 per every home run he hits to the victims of the Moore, Okla., tornado. Kemp is an Oklahoman and he also later donated $250,000 separate from the HR donation.

But because people are now completely incapable of preventing every thought in their head from spilling out and practically trampling each other to prove who can be more cynical than the next person, Kemp's spur-of-the-moment gesture -- in the wake of processing a horrific tragedy hitting close to his HOMETOWN -- was termed by some people as "not generous enough."

I was so floored and disgusted by this that I almost had to lie down to ponder what we have become.

You do not question any individual's charitable contribution.

I don't care how much money that person makes or how little that person makes, you just don't do it.

To do so is completely exposing whatever issues you have in life. I don't know if these critics have problems with money or their families or their relationships or their jobs or their ability to function in life or whatever it is. But there's obviously something there that could make them sink so low as to get out a calculator and judge some person they've never met.

But this is what huge salaries in baseball has done. We're pencil-pushing troll-auditors forever evaluating and assessing and judging.

The gulf between Us and Them is greater than ever.

We wonder why players don't take the time to sign autographs (Kemp, by the way, takes the time to sign lots of them).

This is where we are. Fan and player. We don't think of them as "us," and they don't think of us as "them." They're barely people to us and we're barely people to them.

It's class warfare and I don't want baseball to be like that. I try my very hardest to think of players -- no matter how much money that they make -- as regular people, who grew up playing baseball in a league somewhere, just like you and me, who played high school ball, just like you and me, who got nervous, dreamed big, failed classes, stared at the pretty girl -- just like you and me.

I try to keep it to "you and me," because I don't want to think of "us and them."

It's not easy when I see what some high-paid players do, but I try to think of those incidents as a bad apple in society, not "one of them" with a lot of money.

I honestly was proud when Kemp made the home run donation. I admit, for the slightest flicker of a moment I did think, "hey, wait he has only two home runs." But there is no way I was going to openly criticize someone in the fucking month of May because of that one brief thought that stayed in my head -- like it should have -- until now.

It doesn't matter that he hasn't donated as much as Kevin Durant or anyone else. He's doing something.  This isn't a contest. Stop adding numbers and go donate something.

By the way, that fancy green-bordered Kemp card was generously donated to me by Crackin' Wax, who busted out some Panini Prizm a little while ago. He also recently encountered a situation where someone was taking advantage of him giving out free cards.

Again, no good deed goes unpunished.

But anyway, I got another Panini card from Crackin' Wax.


Clayton Kershaw, as you may know, is into some very worthy causes.

In fact, he donates money for every strikeout to several nonprofit agencies.

Every time I think about it, I am amazed at his dedication to all this, while trying to compete at the highest level of baseball.

But for those of you who just want to troll, go ahead: evaluate whether he's building enough homes in Africa or helping enough disadvantaged kids in L.A.

I'm sure you'll find something you can criticize.

It's sad that this is the only way you have to feel better.

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Settin' 'em up and knockin' 'em down


During the early days of the blog, when I was first trading through the mail, I would finish off team sets fairly quickly. When your want list includes 1990 Donruss Dodgers, people are lining up to fill your order.

I remember Dan from Saints From the Cheap Seats being particularly good at this. There was also a guy named Eric -- he had a blog for awhile -- that did the same. I'd set up my want list stacks and they'd knock them down.

That doesn't happen much anymore. It's not because those guys don't blog anymore, but because I have a lot more Dodgers than a few years ago.

So when I received a card package from Nick of Dime Boxes last week, I couldn't believe my eyes. He actually completed three team sets for me in one swoop.


2000 Stadium Club.


2005 Topps Rookie Cup (yes, I know there are a zillion parallels. Let's not get ahead of ourselves).


1991 Topps Archives (inspiration for the '53 set ... or maybe not).


That's a successful package all by itself. But, of course, Nick didn't stop there, because he's surrounded by dime boxes and relatives who give him cards ... and money ... and money for cards. Oh, and he has the summer off. In short, I don't think he really lives on this planet.

But that's a tangent about my lot in life. You don't want to hear that. Let's see more cards from Nick!


While I'm still on Archives, here's one from the 2001 set. This is how you do Archives. Not that flimsy disappointment from last year. You're mimicking your own brand, Topps! Don't you want it to look nice?


I think I'll stay with the Brooklyn era and then work my way into the future. Ed Roebuck is introducing Clem Labine to a baseball.


A very cool-looking set. It helps you forget that there's a Brooklyn theme to both the photo and the back (Brooklyn logo), but the write-up mentions only his time in L.A. There's that old Upper Deck disconnect.



Do I have this '71 card already? Yes, I have the whole set. But I will not turn away a '71 in this fine a shape. Jim's never looked so young.


Nick sent me a handful of Upper Deck '70s Decade cards for the set completion task. I really enjoy seeing these in card packages. Here's the guy who gave up Hal McRae's first two major league hits. I found that out doing the '71 Topps blog.


Fergie won 20 games for the Cubs six straight years. I'll let that sink in a little. Six straight seasons of 20 wins. For the Cubs. This will never happen again.


BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOG!!!!!!!!!!!!!



This is a terrific throw-in. It's an oddball, it's an Expo, it's from my era, the card back looks like the '82 Topps back except it's yellow. I'm entranced.



Moving into the '90s, which means we'll see cards that are very unfamiliar to me. This is some sort of preview card of 1994 Bowman. Previewing cards was quite the rage in the mid-90s, but I have no idea which year to group this card with in my binder.


National Packtime. Another rage of the mid-1990s. I have a couple of these Packtime cards (terrible name, by the way). I still know nothing about how they were issued.


Evidence that Lance Parrish was a Dodger. Isn't that fun? Parrish was in contention for the Dodgers catching job in 1993, but lost out to a guy named Mike Piazza. Parrish was sent down and never played for L.A. But the LAPD D.A.R.E.'d to put him on a card. Get it? ... Sorry.


Late '90s/early '00s stuff. This era makes me feel sad for the Dodgers. Let's move on.


I'm supposed to like these more than I do. I haven't found a tribute/rip-off set that copies 1956 Topps that I like. Maybe I just consider it something you shouldn't duplicate.


But floating heads? Duplicate away! Put them on every card!


Last card. It's from 2004 Topps Total. I know how much Nick likes Topps Total. I do, too. So do a lot of bloggers. I'm part of the "Bring Back Topps Total" crowd. Unfortunately, it's never coming back.

Topps has said so specifically.

So, sorry, unless you want to take pictures of all the major leaguers and find some nifty card stock and make your own set of 990 players, you're not going to see Topps Total again.

That's me. You set up your dreams and I knock 'em down.

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Isn't that odd


I didn't expect May to be a month of austerity. My traditional austerity months are March, August and December. Yet, here we are, in a month in which I've barely been able to pay for vending machine chips, let alone a box of whatever Topps is inflating the price on today.

This has really cut into my plans to devote this year to acquiring specific needs of mine: Dodgers, set wants and some nice items for fellow bloggers. I had also hoped to go on a spending binge specifically geared toward all of the Dodger cards I still need from 1987-93, excluding annoying parallels like tiffany sets and the like.

The plans are still in place. Just delayed. Fortunately, I've gotten the word out sufficiently.

This note from Jeff appeared in the mailbox the other day:


This is the way to think, everyone. Please follow Jeff's example.

He pays attention and that is always to be commended.

Jeff is an Angels fan and frequent commenter on a couple of my blogs. He's sent me goodies before. And I've got some goodies in place to send back, once regular post office trips are allowed again.

The cards he sent were directly from the late '80s/early '90s with several needs in there, believe it or not.


My kind of Pacific cards. Before the gold fascination.

This Pafko has a dinged corner. But that's just foreshadowing for the condition that my 1952 Topps Pafko will arrive in when it shows up some day. Add a few more dings and creases and paper loss and you've got "Night Owl's Future '52 Pafko."


Mr. Branca, who didn't let the bitterness of being victimized by Giants cheaters affect his future outlook in life. We should all be so strong.



These are 1991 Score SuperStars. Are Score cards oddballs? I know people can get dismissive of Score, but I think they deserve to at least be up there with Donruss.

But my favorite card of the bunch is a definite oddball.

This set always brings a smile to my face:


These crack me up. Jumbo California Sunflower Seeds had a baseball card set!

This isn't even the first time I've written about these on my blog and I still can't get over it.

And look:


"Limited Edition" ... The same thing that made collectors in the '90s react in the same way housewives in the '50s reacted to a SALE sign in the local newspaper.

Thanks, Jeff, for finding me some oddballs during these austere times.

Looking forward to the boom months of June and July.

C.A.: 1975 Topps Ted Sizemore

(Guess what? It's just about time again to elect someone to the Cardboard Appreciation Hall of Fame! One more Cardboard Appreciation after this one and we'll have enough candidates to vote for since the last time we did this. Aren't you excited? Feel like you're going to throw up? I feel ya. But hold that regurgitation. It's time for Cardboard Appreciation. This is the 184th in a series):


I have mentioned this topic several times on my blog before, but I don't think I've ever devoted a full post to it.

If you collected cards as a kid, you probably had your favorite players. They played for your favorite team or they were an all-star that you saw all the time on TV. These are perfectly rational reasons for naming a player your favorite.

But if you were like me, you probably also had favorites "just because." When you look back on those "just because" favorites now -- as a rational adult -- you can't think of one logical reason why you would choose that player as a favorite. It was a player that you liked for literally no reason.

I had lots of those players in my collection. Most of them reside in the 1975 Topps set, as that was the first set I ever collected. I would look in wonder at Dave Nelson, Alan Foster, Dick Ruthven and hold their cardboard dear. They were fierce favorites of mine.

Ted Sizemore was another one. Truly one of my most treasured cards from that first year. And there's no earthly reason why he should have been a favorite.

He wasn't a standout player. He didn't play for the Dodgers (although he used to and he later would again). His picture wasn't notable at all. In fact, he seems to be sneering at the camera and, by extension, sneering at me, a 9-year-old boy, who just wanted to collect his card. Who wants to collect a sneerer?

If I look deeply into my 9-year-old self, as best as I am able to so many years years later, I'm guessing I liked the card because of Sizemore's long hair and mustache that I thought was so cool at the time. And I probably liked the card because of the brown and orange borders, what I would call "root beer colors" at the time. And there's something about that photo background that has an almost dream-like quality. I know I would think that was cool back then.

So those are probably the reasons that I considered a player a favorite that I had no reason to consider a favorite.

But I can't be the only one can I? For those of you who collected as kids, who were some players that you liked that you can't explain why you liked them? They didn't become a significant part of your collection and they didn't play on your favorite team, but you treasured their card anyway.

To this day, I can look at that Sizemore card and the thrill of having that card in my collection that summer of 1975 comes rushing back.

It's obviously meant something to me all these years later no matter how little I've thought about Sizemore since.

After all, this is the very card I pulled from that pack of cards that summer in 1975.

Monday, May 20, 2013

Game really over

(*inhale*)


"Siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ........


iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii........



iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ..........



iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii .................



iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ...........



iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ....................



iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ..................



iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ...............



iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg .......



gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg ..............



ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg ............



gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg ..........



gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg ..........



gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh .........



hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh .....



hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh ....



hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh."

(*gasp*)

(*collapse on floor in dejected heap*)


Sorry. I was just reminiscing there for a minute.

No reason. No reason at all.