Sunday, July 5, 2015
Weekend festivities have really blown a hole in blog posting. I had in mind what I thought was a somewhat creative 4th Of July post slated for yesterday. But I didn't even see the beer and frivolity coming and now you're all going to have to wait a year for that one.
Today I had a different post in mind, but home renovations are preventing me from getting to most of my cards.
So, welcome to option No. 3 of the weekend.
This is a "card" that I received from Zach at Autographed Cards. I believe he pulled it from a Series 2 blaster/value box, and wondered whether I wanted it.
I admit, I waffled and worried over whether I wanted it for far too long. These manu-cards, as you know, are not my speed. It's a little too craft-fair for me, even when they're working in a manly medium like wood. Sometimes I read certain collectors fawning over items like this and I don't get it. It's an imitation bat knob. I barely know what to do with a real bat knob. Why is this considered a thing that anyone would desire?
Think back several years ago when you were collecting, or even collecting as a kid. Did you ever once wish you had a bat knob in your collection? A bat, sure. A bat knob? Never.
But I couldn't turn down the fake bat knob card. It's commemorating Jackie Robinson, and even though the picture on it has been repeated more often than episodes of "How I Met Your Mother" (I'm going to call this "Jackie pose No. 4"), I can't say "no" to Robinson.
Due to the wood piece on the card, it is very thick. It takes 15 cards of 2015 Topps average thickness to match one of these commemorative bat knob cards. That means this is now the thickest card that I own. The previous thickest card measured just 12 average cards:
As you know, card thickness can be an issue. Even Zach, in his note said he had no idea what to do with it.
I, as well, will hunt vainly for a top loader or case that can house this item, and it will be months and months before I come across one.
And then the fake bat knob card will join my fake ring card and my fake patch cards in a special place reserved for commemorative fakery in my collection.
But really I should not be as hard on these as I am.
I just didn't know I wanted them.
Friday, July 3, 2015
I hope you are not making plans already to be away from your computer/phone this weekend.
I've constructed the latest edition of the All-Time Topps Countdown as part of my patriotic duty as an American card blogger. You may announce your patriotic pride by stuffing yourself full of hot dogs and blasting off ungodly noisy devices way too close to people's delicate ear drums, I do this.
This is my Independence Day gift to you. If you're getting tired of the relentless outdoor activity this weekend, this post will be here for you. And if that sun is just way too hot and feels like it's burning into your brain, well I purposely selected a snow-covered owl here to help you cool down.
And now, let's see sets No. 28 through 25 on the countdown:
28. 1979 Topps
All throughout this countdown, I've felt like I have been giving 1970s sets an unfair advantage. It's true, the '70s feature the sets that are nearest and dearest to my heart, but are they really that good?
I'm way too invested in that decade to provide an objective answer. Even if I think I'm being objective, I'm still going to say the '70s had the greatest cards, and I don't know if that is necessarily true.
I probably feel the most guilty about 1979 Topps, because I have never felt it was that great of a set.
Keep in mind, this is me saying this from way back in 1979. The 1979 Topps set is the first set I ever pulled out of a pack and was disappointed with what I saw. That seems strange now, because when I see the set more than 35 years later, all I see is greatness:
Ozzie's first card.
The best rookie card ever.
The first Molitor card where he didn't have to share it with three other guys.
The Pirates' banana uniforms.
And the classic Padres brown-and-gold.
These were good times, and I'm not just saying that because a song by the same name went to No. 1 for half the summer in 1979. It is a very memorable year for me.
But that's just nostalgia talking. On its face, 1979 Topps is a ho-hum set in a bright and wonderful decade.
Maybe I grew cynical because of all of the Wayne Cage cards I pulled that year (this was the second straight year of Topps double-printing some cards). But it was more than that. The design didn't hold up compared with previous designs from my first five years of collecting. The ribbon just didn't cut it.
The cards leave a lot of space for the photo, which is a point in '79's favor. But it didn't do much with it.
The cards in the set have a lazy, glazy, hazy look to them. I don't know if you can see this on a scan, but I picked out a couple of examples.
Trust me, they're hazy. Staring at the photos in this set makes me feel as I'm looking at the players through mosquito netting. And even at the young age of 13, I noticed that the quality of the pictures just didn't match those of the previous year.
Photo cropping seems to be a significant issue for 1979 Topps.
So, why am I ranking '79 Topps this high with amount of disappointment involved?
Well, there are some decent cards:
And I spent a lot of time on the card backs that year:
Although the third green-backed set in the past six years was a little boring, I loved the baseball dates trivia questions and poured over them. This was good rainy day stuff.
But mostly, we're talking about nostalgia for the reason 1979 Topps is at No. 28 in the countdown.
Those emotionless, just-the-facts people will tell you 1979 Topps is known for a few rookie cards and the fact that the Topps logo appeared on the front of virtually every card in the set for the first time in its history.
But as kids, we didn't even notice that. We were too busy appreciating the first card of Rich Gossage in an actual Yankees uniform (instead of the full-body airbrushed job in '78 Topps).
Sometimes, nostalgia is enough.
27. 2009 Topps
The biggest enemy of the 2009 Topps set is the internet, more specifically, card blogs.
If no one scanned cards and uploaded them onto a blog, underlining 2009 Topps' greatest flaw, there would be fewer complaints about this set.
Sitting at the computer now, and leafing through some 2009 cards, I have no trouble reading them. The foil glints in the light and the names practically pop off the black background. But online? Silver foil letters on a black background is a no-no. It's barely readable and the cards show up on your backlit screen as if someone left off the player's name and team name. It doesn't look good.
However, in person? 2009 Topps looks very good.
Keep in mind, this set followed the 2008 disaster. During that year, Topps treated the photo as a second-class citizen and confined the space for pictures so much that a number of baseball plays just couldn't be featured on 2008 cards.
The 2009 design opened up a whole new world:
Try to picture those on 2008 Topps. You can't. Only the Esteban German card on the top left (trust me, it's Esteban German) would work in '08 Topps, and you'd still lose much of the scoreboard and grass splendor.
Believe me, this was much appreciated, and 2009 Topps arrived to much fanfare. I considered it one of the best Topps flagship sets in years at the time, set out to complete it, and I still like it quite a bit.
The beauty of 2009 Topps is that the photos tell a story. Although there are plenty of pictures of batters swinging and pitchers throwing, there is much more than that.
The photos show thought and originality.
They really give you a insight into the game.
I also love the tilted home plate team logo, and although I can never describe the rest of the design (are those supposed to stadium lights in the top and bottom corners?), I know I like it.
2009 Topps falls a few notches because some of the photos in Series 2 are too dark. This is pretty disappointing on such a nice-looking set.
The backs are basic except for the interesting statistical factoid that travels over the dome on each player's card. OK, the card numbers are unreadable, too.
Detractors of this set will mention the Walmart black parallels and Target throwback parallels and the messy way those were issued and discovered. But I like this set because it gave me hope for flagship after the previous couple of years (2007 and 2008 in particular).
This set shows a lot of thought and some originality.
It's just too bad it had to show up on the internet.
26. 1963 Topps
I think some collectors would consider this set almost iconic. The James Bond logo style design featuring a black-and-white image of the player is reflective of the time (the first Bond movie, "Dr. No," appeared in 1962 and features the gun barrel sequence that would appear in all Bond movies to come).
It also paves the way for some future Topps sets, most notably 1983 Topps.
But while it has all of that going for it, I'm still not crazy about it.
I think 1983 Topps pulls off this design better -- much, much better. The head shot belongs in the inset and the action or full-body shot in the main photo. It just makes sense. More to show? Put it in the large photo. The full-body shot in 1963 Topps just gets lost, particularly because it's black-and-white.
In a previous post, I mentioned how I don't like color and black-and-white images mixing on cards and it really affects me in 1963 Topps (I also forgot to mention in the 1979 Topps segment that the black-and-white rookie cards in that set have always bothered me).
Although this set appears original, it's not entirely. The 1954, 1955 and 1960 Topps sets all used the two-image card fronts. This is probably the best of the four.
After two sets with relatively little color -- 1961 and 1962 Topps -- kids were probably excited to see multiple colors in a set again, along the lines the 1958-60 sets. Unfortunately, I find the pairing of the two colors on the bottom jarring. And I'm still scarred by trying in vain to keep my 1963 Don Drysdale card from scuffing on the bottom.
I don't have much use for early 1960s card backs. The cartoons are large, I'll give it that, but a little too old-fashioned for me.
1963 Topps has its place in baseball card history. It always will be difficult to forget while other Topps sets will be erased by time.
But it will never be my favorite. And that's why it's where it is in the countdown. Sometimes you got to live and let die.
25. 2011 Topps
I've said it before, I'll say it again:
As card collectors, we hate the present.
Nothing issued today is good enough. Even when it is good enough, someone out there will still criticize it. The card stock's too thin, there's not enough of my favorite team, the foil's too shiny, they don't look like the cards I collected as a kid, I hate my life, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
I'm sure it was all said about 2011 Topps.
But step back for a minute, if you can.
Actually, 2011 Topps looks great.
This set came along at a time when I was starting to move away from modern cards. So I never completed the set. But even though I was making a conscious effort not to buy as many modern cards as I had in previous years, I still found myself picking up 2011 Topps. I couldn't help myself, they looked soo good.
Like 2009 Topps, the photo is the star of the show, and there are so many great shots in 2011 Topps that I had a difficult time selecting just a few. These are also well-framed cards.
The design is terrific, one of my recent favorites. The comet-style streak ends in a baseball with a team logo, with a colored border that gives a 3-D quality to the baseball. I love it.
Sometimes the design takes up a little too much space, particularly on the vertical cards. This is a fantastic photo, one of my favorites in the set. But the picture is so good, I wish the streak wasn't even there.
Of course, you know what that means: this is Stadium Club territory. With that kind of photo, you don't need a blasted design.
Because 2011 Topps exists in the modern world, it contains some pain-in-the-butt aspects, such as this:
There is really no need to have two different cards of the same player just because he has a rookie cup featured on one of them.
But overall, I don't think this set gets enough credit.
Got to love full career stats. And the blurb running down the right-hand side in which it compares the card number with a card number of a past Topps set, is a quiet gem of a factoid.
Sure, if you're hardline old school then you're going to be mad at it for featuring foil or too many action shots or whatever.
All I know is I like 2011 Topps, and I'm trying to figure out now why I didn't complete it.
Up next: sets #24-21
Thursday, July 2, 2015
That's the first line of a note in the latest fantastic card package from Dave. "A little more of everything," is the best way to sum up the contents. I could easily break this up into six different posts, but what fun is that?
No, you need to see this in its totality. Gaze upon the splendor. Marvel at the magnificence. Bathe in the bounty. We're going to cover a little more of everything.
I'll start with this:
That's a rack pack of 1987 Topps, carefully selected for the Fernando Valenzuela all-star glossy showing in the first panel.
See, Dave takes me seriously when I say I want to try to complete 1987 Topps passively. I don't want to intentionally buy a 1987 Topps card. And I certainly don't want to put up a want list. I'd like to see how close I can come to doing this. I'm looking forward to opening this rack pack and seeing how many I need.
Random Dodgers, most of which I'm sure fill holes (we'll see later). Yes, I put PlayStation advertisements in my Dodger binder. I need that Puig pose in there somewhere.
These aren't all the Dodgers in the package. You know how I play the game here. Best stuff last.
A couple Sabres from the days when I knew every Sabre on the team. These are from 1990-91 Topps, just after I covered a handful of Sabres games.
One of the best parts of hockey cards from this period and earlier are the backs. I'm fairly certain Topps purposely went with blue backs, or "cool colors," for hockey cards to evoke the feeling of ice. As a baseball card collector, I was always jealous of hockey card backs.
Randy Smith of the Buffalo Braves. A little more of everything, people!
As you know, I don't collect basketball, but this is different. The Braves are Buffalo history. They were before my time, but I remember my grandfather briefly mentioning them and I vaguely recall reading accounts in the old Courier-Express of the team moving to San Diego when I was a kid visiting Buffalo for the summer.
Randy Smith is the most memorable Brave and he and I attended the same college. Buffalo State College is proud of its alumnus and I'm sure it's proud of Randy, too.
Random '56s! I get the biggest kick out of the Jim Wilson card. It appears that Wilson is fielding at first base, and lunging for an errant throw. Not the most routine play there.
Night Cardage. I can always count on Dave for night cards, and a wide variety, too. These aren't even close to all of them. I'm saving a bunch (and probably these, too) for Awesome Night Card, including one that I cannot wait to show because I had no idea it was a night card.
I know. The suspense, your brain cannot handle.
There were so many great, old Buffalo Bills cards in this package, and you're going to see most of them. The 1974 Topps football set has got to be the most literally designed set of all-time, much like 1982 or 1983 Donruss. The design screams "LOOK! This is Football! Goal posts! Am I subtle enough for you?"
By the way, as a kid I had no idea Joe Ferguson was also a Sabres quarterback. It took until the '80s -- and the catcher Joe Ferguson no longer being in baseball -- for me to catch on.
How many Buffalo Bills cards? Well, there were these six from 1973 Topps! I confess I don't know early '70s Bills very well. It's O.J. and that's about it.
Speaking of O.J.:
My name is A.C. You know who I am, god dammit.
Now we are in football heaven. This is the set. This is the set that I want to complete someday. 1977 Topps. I love these so much.
And I especially love this card:
Find me a sadder person on a trading card. I believe it does not exist.
This is the other football set besides '77 Topps that I collected heavily, 1979 Topps. These are pretty cool, although the bottom two guys on the right look like they're wearing Lions jerseys. That's not pretty cool.
I remember owning the Merv Krakau card and almost being appalled at how old he seemed. Why are they letting 52-year-old guys play football? It turns out he was 27 at the time. And I'm relieved to see he's still with us.
Also, I hoped you noticed the Bills had two guys named Dennis Johnson on the team.
Thanks to Dave, I am four cards short of completing the team set!
These are from 1981. I recognize more of the players, but not the design. I had completely quit collecting football cards by the '80s. Not a sniff, until the Pro Sets started showing up.
More football to come, but I need to show you this first:
1970 Topps set the record for bats. You throw in the Jose Laboy card I showed previously, the Jay Johnstone and Juan Rios and Gerry Moses and Harmon Killebrew cards from this set and there is no contest.
Gail Hopkins wants to make it a contest, with his batmobile traveling in the background, but it's not.
And since I showed this 1972 high number that Dave sent, let's see the others:
Are those orange trees behind Pat Jarvis and his teammates? Please say they are.
Del Rice is a manager. Topps doesn't want to tell you that.
Bob Burda's airbrushed hat is blocking everything.
OK, back to football. 1971 Topps football is a wonderful set. If I had any clue or memory of the players on these cards, I'd collect it in an instant. But it will remain one of those "greatest looking sets I'll never collect".
This is from 1969. These cards look almost a decade older than 1969. But the best part are the backs:
Black backs are fantastic.
All of these football cards have finally convinced me to start a binder with non-baseball sports cards in it. Yes, all of my non-baseball has been suffering in boxes. But it's just not right to have cards like this relegated there. A new binder awaits.
OK, nothing but baseball from here on out:
A 1953 Topps of backup catcher Dixie Howell! This is starting to convince me that completing the '53 Topps Dodger set is a good possibility! Stop whispering about Jackie Robinson. You're killing the mood.
Yay! High-numbered and expertly-cut Johnny Podres means I am only a Koufax and a league-leader card away from finishing the '64 Dodgers team set. Even I can do that before the year is out.
Final card. It's a 1939 Play Ball Dolph Camilli. Damn, that's a sweet card.
Dave is my Dolph Camilli supplier. Even he doesn't know where they're coming from all of a sudden.
That is a terrific and varied package. I'm stunned by some of the cards that I didn't even show, but this post has gone on too long.
"A little more of everything" not only gave me lots of good stuff for the collection, but a couple of future blog posts and convinced me to better organize some of my collection.
Don't underestimate collecting a little more of everything. It comes in handy.